Skip to main content

COMPARATIVE STUDY - CHECKLIST



COMPARATIVE STUDY - CHECK LIST
No candidate name/session number or school name in the comparative study

Introduction to the Comparative Study – Very important, how this investigation impacted on your art practice overall- not just for the artwork you are comparing.  

Three artworks, at least two of which should be by different artists

Artworks come from contrasting contexts (local, national, international and/or intercultural)

Identification of the cultural contexts in which the selected pieces were created 

Identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected pieces 
Analysis can take many forms: • The use of visual means such as details, juxtaposition, graphical explanation • The use of language to explain and to explore. In a good study, a candidate will use evidence to support their analysis • Such as informed research • Or detailed observation. Breakdown details in points. 

Analysis and understanding of the function and purpose of the selected pieces 

Analysis and evaluation of the material; the conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces to the cultural contexts within which they were created

Comparing and contrasting the selected pieces, identifying links in cultural context, formal qualities, function, purpose, material, conceptual and cultural significance 

Compare artworks, rather than comparing artists

Subject-specific language in each screen (https://www.moma.org/learn/moma_learning/glossary)

HL - Analyse and evaluate the outcomes of the investigation 

HL - Analyse and evaluate the extent to which their work and practices have been influenced by the art and artists examined

Range of different sources 

Referencing: Title, artist, date and the source.

Every image and text used within the comparative study has been appropriately referenced – (In-text [on screen] and list of sources [bibliography])

Students must ensure their own original work is identified and acknowledged in the same way

All the screens are in a horizontal format and have consistent use of appropriate subject-specific language

All the writing is legible and the background does not interfere with the text

Font size is not less than 12 points & all the screens are numbered

Teachers have met with the students at each stage of inquiry, action and reflection to discuss the progress and verify authenticity - CAF

FINAL E-SUBMISSION
SL  10-15 screens

HL  10-15 screens, plus 3-5 screens of their original artwork

PDF FILE of the Comparative Study – Max 20MB (I will make the pdfs)

TEXT FILE - List of sources (doc, Docx, pdf, RTF) – Max 1MB


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Examples of CS screens.

  Part 2 (SL and HL): Process portfolio External Assessment 40% Why assess a process portfolio? The process portfolio task authentically assesses the ways that students develop and work towards producing a body of work. It reflects the holistic nature of the course, addressing each of the assessment objectives. It places due emphasis on the process of selecting work to evidence students’ technical accomplishment during the visual arts course and their understanding of the use of materials, ideas and practices appropriate to visual communication. It also highlights the product and promotes an engagement with a broad range of media. Core syllabus areas related to the task The following core syllabus areas are addressed in the process portfolio assessment task. Visual arts in context Investigating how processes in art have changed and how media or techniques have developed or technologically evolved over time Familiarization with various art genres, styles