Skip to main content

EXHIBITION - CHECKLIST


EXHIBITION - CHECKLIST
√
No candidate name / session number or school name in the comparative study

A coherent body of resolved artworks for their exhibition

Selected pieces should show evidence of the technical accomplishment during the visual arts course

Selected pieces should show the understanding of the use of materials, ideas and practices to realize the stated intentions

Evidence the decision-making process which underpins the selection of this connected and cohesive body of work for an audience

All the artworks presented have been made or constructed by the student

The student has identified if objects are self-made, found or purchased under the ‘medium’ section

When the student is aware that another person’s work, ideas or images have influenced their selected pieces for exhibition the source is included within the exhibition text or in the curatorial rationale.

CR SL/HL - What are you hoping to achieve by presenting this body of work? 

CR SL/HL - What impact will this body of work have on your audience? 

CR SL/HL - What are the concepts and understandings you initially intend to convey? 

CR SL/HL - How have particular issues, motifs or ideas been explored, or particular materials or techniques used? 

CR SL/HL - What themes can be identified in the work, or what experiences have influenced it? 

CR SL/HL - How does the way you have exhibited your artwork contribute to the meanings you are trying to convey to an audience? 

CR HL - What strategies did you use to develop a relationship between the artwork and the viewer, for example, visual impact? 

CR HL - How does the way you have arranged and presented your artworks support the relationship and connection between the artworks presented? 

CR HL - What do you intend your audience to feel, think, experience, understand, see, learn, consider from the work you have selected for exhibition? 

Only the selected artworks submitted for assessment, appear in the 2 exhibition photographs

Teachers have met with the students at each stage of inquiry, action and reflection to discuss the progress and verify authenticity - CAF

FINAL E-SUBMISSION

Curatorial Rationale - SL 400 words - Text file (doc, docx, pdf, rtf) – Max 1MB

Curatorial Rationale - HL 700 words - Text file (doc, docx, pdf, rtf) – Max 1MB

Exhibition Photographs – SL/HL 2 photos - (jpg, tif) – Max 5MB

Artworks – SL 4-7 (image: jpg, tif max 5MB) (video: m4v, mov, mp4 max 5min/500MB)

Artworks – HL 8-11 (image: jpg, tif max 5MB) (video: m4v, mov, mp4 max 5min/500MB)

Optional supporting photographs – SL/HL 2 per artwork (image: jpg, tif max 5MB)

Exhibition Text – SL/HL - Title, medium, size and a brief outline of the original intentions of each selected artwork and any sources which have influenced the individual piece (500 characters maximum per artwork)


- Toni Hauri, 2017.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

COMPARATIVE STUDY - CHECKLIST

COMPARATIVE STUDY - CHECK LIST √ No candidate name/session number or school name in the comparative study Introduction to the Comparative Study – Very important, how this investigation impacted on your art practice overall- not just for the artwork you are comparing.   Three artworks, at least two of which should be by different artists Artworks come from contrasting contexts (local, national, international and/or intercultural) Identification of the cultural contexts in which the selected pieces were created  Identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected pieces  Analysis can take many forms: • The use of visual means such as details, juxtaposition, graphical explanation • The use of language to explain and to explore. In a good study, a candidate will use evidence to support their analysis • Such as informed research • Or detailed observation. Breakdown details in points.   Analysis and understanding of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Part 3 (SL and HL): Exhibition

  Part 3 (SL and HL): Exhibition Internal Assessment 40% Why assess an exhibition? The exhibition provides an assessment platform for both SL and HL students to showcase the final product of their art-making processes. It allows for the assessment of the observable qualities of technical resolution, the successful communication of ideas and the synthesis of form and function. It also provides students with the opportunity to demonstrate their discernment in determining the strongest works for the exhibition and how to best arrange these works to their best advantage and to make connections for the audience between works. Additionally, HL students need to articulate how they have considered possible relationships between the artworks exhibited and the viewer. Core syllabus areas related to the task The following core syllabus areas are addressed in the exhibition assessment task. Visual arts in context Informed by their responses to work and exhibitions they hav...
Post a Comment
Read more

Curatorial Rationale (Artist Statement)

Curatorial Rationale (Artist Statement) What is a Curatorial Rationale? The Curatorial Rationale is similar to an artists’ statement but refers specifically to the work selected for this exhibition rather than the general artistic output. Writing the Rationale is part of the process of self- reflection, decision making, and understanding of the relationship between artist and audience. Break it down into 3 parts: Overview, concepts, and ideas Selection of works Viewer Relationships Overview, concepts, and ideas (theme): You set the stage, so to speak, introducing us to the exhibition, what it is about and what are the underlying themes or threads. How did your theme come about? What are the concepts, issues or ideas you have explored here and how are they linked in your work?  What experiences have contributed to the making of this work? Selection of works The second paragraph can be a general discussion of the works in the show, or you may c...
Post a Comment
Read more