Skip to main content

PROCESS PORTFOLIO - CHECKLIST


PROCESS PORTFOLIO - CHECKLIST
√
No candidate name/session number or school name in the comparative study

Explore and work with a variety of techniques, technologies, effects and processes 

Extend personal technical skills 

LBESB; contact sheets, test prints, darkroom experimentation, screen-shots of screen-based work in development, diagrams of studio or improvised lighting set-ups.

Make independent decisions about the choices of media, form and purpose that are appropriate to the intentions 

Learning about the processes of experimenting, exploring, manipulating and refining the use of media in a variety of ways 

Reflect on the processes

Evidence of investigation, development of ideas and artworks

There is a balance between board explorations and sustained focus

Range of different sources

Referencing: Title, artist, date and the source

Every image and text used within the process portfolio has been appropriately referenced, in-text

Students must ensure their own original work is identified and acknowledged in the same way

Students declared when an image in the final version of the work is also used in part 3: exhibition assessment task

All the screens are in a horizontal format and have a consistent use of appropriate subject-specific language

Subject specific language in each screen (https://www.moma.org/learn/moma_learning/glossary)

All the writing is legible and the background does not interfere with the text & all the screens are numbered

Font size is not less than 12 points (avoid writing in spirals or in various directions)

The different art making forms are clearly marked in bold text (e.g. oil painting, digital photography, etc.)

SL - Work must have been created in at least two art-making forms, each from separate columns from the art-making forms table

HL - Work must have been created in at least three art-making forms, selected from a minimum of two columns of the art-making forms table

FINAL E-SUBMISSION
SL  9-18 screens

HL  13-25 screens

PDF FILE of the Process Portfolio – Max 20MB



Art-making forms table – ONLY FOR PP
Two-dimensional forms
Three-dimensional forms
*[LSESB] Lens-based, electronic and 
screen-based forms
Drawing: such as charcoal, pencil, ink, collage 
Painting: such as acrylic, oil, watercolour, murals 
Printmaking: such as relief, intaglio, planographic, chine collé 
Graphics: such as illustration and design, graphic novel, storyboard 
Carved sculpture: such as carved wood, stone, block 
Modelled sculpture: such as wax, polymer clays 
Constructed sculpture: such as assemblage, bricolage, wood, plastic, paper, glass 
Cast sculpture: such as plaster, wax, bronze, paper, plastic, glass 
Ceramics: such as hand-built forms, thrown vessels, mould-made objects 
Designed objects: such as fashion, architectural models, interior design, jewellery 
Site specific/ephemeral: such as land art, installation, performance art 
Textiles: such as fibre, weaving, constructed textiles 
Time-based and sequential art: such as stop-motion, digital animation, video art 
Lens media: such as analogue (wet) photography, digital photography, montage 
Lens-less media: such as photogram/rayograph, scenography, pinhole photography, cyanotype, salted paper 
Digital/screen based: such as vector graphics, software developed painting, design and illustration

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Part 3 (SL and HL): Exhibition

  Part 3 (SL and HL): Exhibition Internal Assessment 40% Why assess an exhibition? The exhibition provides an assessment platform for both SL and HL students to showcase the final product of their art-making processes. It allows for the assessment of the observable qualities of technical resolution, the successful communication of ideas and the synthesis of form and function. It also provides students with the opportunity to demonstrate their discernment in determining the strongest works for the exhibition and how to best arrange these works to their best advantage and to make connections for the audience between works. Additionally, HL students need to articulate how they have considered possible relationships between the artworks exhibited and the viewer. Core syllabus areas related to the task The following core syllabus areas are addressed in the exhibition assessment task. Visual arts in context Informed by their responses to work and exhibitions they hav...
Post a Comment
Read more

COMPARATIVE STUDY - CHECKLIST

COMPARATIVE STUDY - CHECK LIST √ No candidate name/session number or school name in the comparative study Introduction to the Comparative Study – Very important, how this investigation impacted on your art practice overall- not just for the artwork you are comparing.   Three artworks, at least two of which should be by different artists Artworks come from contrasting contexts (local, national, international and/or intercultural) Identification of the cultural contexts in which the selected pieces were created  Identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected pieces  Analysis can take many forms: • The use of visual means such as details, juxtaposition, graphical explanation • The use of language to explain and to explore. In a good study, a candidate will use evidence to support their analysis • Such as informed research • Or detailed observation. Breakdown details in points.   Analysis and understanding of the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Comparative study guidance - simple templates

Comparative study guidance Criteria A - Formal analysis Analysing an Image Format  What is happening in the image?  Write down your first feelings about the artworks.  What do you think about it?  Basic facts  • What is its title?  • Who made it (artist name)?  • What is made of (medium used)?  Context and intention  • Where was it made?  • What else was going on at the time the artwork was made? (other artist, other art movements, technological innovations like photo , oil paint, digital media, religious and cultural influence)  • Why was it made?  • Who was it made for?( commissioned/ paid)  • Consider the present context.  • Why was this work selected to be exhibited?  • Who selected it?  • Why is it shown in this way?  Details-  Does it look like something you know or recognise? ..........................................................................
Post a Comment
Read more